PDA

View Full Version : Huh?

Blue79
02-05-2009, 08:03 PM
http://philadelphia.craigslist.org/cto/993083339.html

65?
I thought 66 was the first?
Johnny
02-05-2009, 08:09 PM
Some of the earliest ones were titled as a 65..... much like the early Mustangs..... even though they are 66 models.... they were sold in 65...
Blue79
02-05-2009, 08:37 PM
what, I thought you could buy a 64 1/2 mustang?
Johnny
02-05-2009, 08:55 PM
Nope... far as I know they were titled as 65's...

OK... had to clear this up a bit....

As far as I know... there were some early 66 Bronco's that were sold and titled as 65's
But.... the 64 1/2 Mustangs that were sold before 65 were still titled as 65's....
mrw
02-07-2009, 01:39 PM
Cleat as mud there pal. ?>:<?
JfB_93
02-09-2009, 07:33 PM
I own a 64 1/2 mustang they were titled as 64 1/2
Blue79
02-09-2009, 07:38 PM
I TOLD them but Nooooo.
JfB_93
02-09-2009, 08:04 PM
been in my family since new
Johnny
02-09-2009, 08:18 PM
I read somewhere that Ford never titled a 64 1/2 as a 64 1/2..... but I guess with Ford, you can never say never...
OX1
02-13-2009, 06:37 PM
http://philadelphia.craigslist.org/cto/993083339.html

65?
I thought 66 was the first?


is that ad legit???
MIL1ION
02-15-2009, 12:55 AM
64 1/2 Mustangs were supposed to have been titled as a 65.

There were some that made it as 64's.........64 1/2 was NOT available in any jurisdiction I know of.

With the DMV ...It was either a 64 or 65


How would like to won one of these K-code Stangs?

http://inlinethumb55.webshots.com/41718/2501453010012099056S600x600Q85.jpg (http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2501453010012099056AIUmuy)